FAPT: Pirate Logs

Been much too long since I’ve written one of these, which I’d like to blame on a lack of good ideas crossing my desk (so to speak) but is really just because I’ve been a bit lazy about searching them out.

So sue me. You’d get tired of searching after scrolling past the 3856934th “IDEA: NERF AFK CLOAKING” thread too.

Anyway, Pirate Logs. Who remembers these, raise your hand? If your hand’s up you’ve been playing for quite a long time, as these things have not dropped in ages. They used to be intended to lead people to the old static complexes, or something, which was rather pointless since everyone knew where those were anyway. After all, they were static. At some point – probably when CCP shifted the static complexes to scanning – they were removed from the game and forgotten.

Until now, apparently. A player by the name of Andrea Griffin wrote a post proposing they be brought back and repurposed. The idea, quite simply, would be to add to exploration, a different way to find content similar to what CCP is adding in Odyssey, but distinct in flavor and hopefully in mechanics, to keep it interesting.

Great idea. There is not a single bad thing I can say about this, and I hardly even have to say anything good about it, because the poster identified virtually everything already.

  • It can introduce players to the idea of exploration and expeditions.

  • It can encourage more high-sec players to explore lowsec. They can see that expedition right there in their journal, calling to them. They know exactly where to go.

  • A new market segment opens up for trading ship logs – people who won’t want to do the expeditions can sell the logs.

  • It helps tell stories in Eve. Some of the ship logs are funny, some are creepy, but all of them add important bits of flavor.

  • It’s easy to iterate on.

  • Most of the work has already been done.

Just about the only thing I can think of to add to this is that if they were to drop in nullsec (and I really don’t see any good reason why they shouldn’t), it’s a tool with which to tune ratting income. Want it higher? Leave things as is. Or maybe it’s high enough already, so they can nerf bounties again (thus reducing the faucet) and leave the sale of the logs or the loot gleaned from them to make up the difference. Sounds like a win-win to me.

Count on this being something I’ll be bringing to CCP’s attention as a future means of iterating on their new exploration features.

And before signing off on this post, I’d like to mention how great I think the new exploration feature is. They’re quick to find and complete, which is a boon to the more casual player. They require active engagement, both to break the lock and to grab the loot. If CCP hits their mark (and odd as it sounds to say, I have faith that they will, or will quickly revisit it if not) they’ll be rewarding to a solo player, and proportionally more rewarding to a small group of players, thanks to the “space pinata” mechanic for getting at the loot. More importantly, that small group of players has to be a small group of genuinely individual players. Unlike other notionally “group” content, multiboxing won’t gain you much. You might be able to get some increase in income if you’re really fast, but you’ll be better off still if the second pilot really is a second player. That’s a big deal, as encouraging players to bring actual groups instead of more alts, yet not punishing them by cutting into the per-player income, is one of the large obstacles to true “group” content in the game.

I expect we’ll start to see more of this style of thing over the coming expansions, and so long as new mechanics can be kept distinct and flavorful from the older ones (that is, I don’t think “space pinata all the time!” will be interesting), I definitely welcome it.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “FAPT: Pirate Logs

  1. Pingback: Pirate Ship Logs, part 2 | Serpentine's Eve

  2. A lot of potential in ideas like this. Also a general look at recycling features and ideas from mission content would be very valuable. Lateral integration of the different mission types could also highly improve the game. Making the mining mission ores return to being real ore, but in quantity that makes it balanced and not break values. Currently a lot of artifact code exist withing missioning, and not in a positive way.

    Also would be extremely useful to this feature and many other potential player made activity if we could evemail attach bookmarks and log files like these with locations.

    Letting these somehow spawn when the locations spawn in a set number and spread out in range from the target, would mean that potentially a whole little swarm of players would be going to the location, and thus cause some natural emerging gameplay, collaborative or competition.

    Like

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Incursive Missioning | Real - EVE

  4. I really like the ships log idea as well. It would be interesting to see what type of crazy spreadsheet magic would play out to determine the pricing of each ship log.

    One minor addition to the Eve-Hacking mini-game that I think is lacking (and would be really easy to add):

    Right now there isn’t anything the 2nd person (or 3rd or 4th) person can do while waiting for the primary person to break the lock on the mini-game. So the only incentive that the N>1 person has to wait around is loot.

    Why not make people on grid with an analyzer be able to increase the primary person’s virus stats? Or maybe a Remote Analyzer Booster module with an insane stacking penalty?

    Incentivise bringing that 2nd person besides waiting around and getting bacon is the main point.

    <3 Mynnna

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s